I suppose it makes sense, when a workforce is threatened, to go to the representatives of that workforce to get their side of the story. That would seem like the most logical way of telling the story, I suppose. But how is the Mail covering it, out of interest?
Ah I see. Well if the 'Flake girls' responsible for 'sexy adverts' are backing the campaign, then I think we can be assured of success.
4 comments:
And of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with a flimsy excuse to run pictures of fruity women...
I wouldn't trust the opinions of anyone who thinks eating chocolate in the bath is a good idea.
Not at all related to the post, but have you seen this fantastic mail headline?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235517/Prince-Philip-causes-controversy-joking-blind-IRA-heros-tie-choice.html
God help the sub that came up with that corker!
if you hadn't said that newspaper report was the mail's, i would have sworn it was from the sun. i haven't seen the sun's coverage of this story but that's how i'd imagine it to be. so much for the mail being better than the other tabloids, eh?
Post a Comment